My Account
We compare quotes from leading insurers
QA & INSPECTION FAILURE RISK — A MAJOR COST DRIVER IN PRECISION ENGINEERING
Why Measurement & Inspection Failures Create Big Losses
In precision engineering, the difference between “pass” and “fail” can be microns. If measurement, inspection or QA systems fail, you can inadvertently ship non-conforming parts — creating a “quality escape” that cascades through customer production lines.
These incidents can lead to scrap, rework, expedited manufacturing, line stoppage, chargebacks and loss of supplier status — even where no one is injured and no physical damage occurs. That matters because standard liability policies often respond differently to injury/property damage vs pure financial loss.
This page explains common QA failure scenarios, the real-world consequences, and the insurance covers that can be relevant — including product liability, professional indemnity (where inspection is treated as a service), recall/rectification options, and business interruption.
What Is Measurement, Inspection & QA Failure Risk?
QA failure risk is the risk that your inspection and measurement controls do not detect non-conforming parts before shipment. It can be caused by people, process, equipment, systems, or subcontracted services — and it often involves a “latent” period where the problem exists but isn’t discovered until the customer reports issues.
In precision engineering, QA risk is concentrated around:
- Calibration and integrity of metrology equipment
- Inspection planning and sampling strategy (how you decide what to measure and how often)
- Operator measurement technique and training
- Fixture integrity, datum selection and measurement setup
- Version control for drawings/specifications and correct revision use
- Supplier/subcontract QA for special processes (heat treat, coating, surface finishing)
- Data integrity for digital inspection records and traceability
Common QA Failure Causes
- Out-of-calibration micrometers, gauges, CMM probes or optical systems
- Incorrect measurement program or wrong part number loaded on CMM
- Human error in reading instruments or recording values
- Sampling plans that miss drift or batch variation
- Incorrect drawing revision or tolerance interpretation
- Fixturing or datum error causing false pass results
- Inadequate segregation of non-conforming product
- Subcontract process variation (coating thickness, heat treat hardness) not verified
Common Outcomes
- Customer line stop / downtime allegations
- Sorting and containment at customer site (“100% inspection”)
- Chargebacks, debit notes and penalty clauses
- Scrap and remanufacture costs
- Tooling, fixture and process revalidation costs
- Loss of approved supplier status / scorecard impacts
- Downstream damage claims if a defective part causes failure
Which Insurance Policies Are Relevant to QA & Inspection Failures?
QA failures can lead to different types of loss. The insurance response often depends on whether there is: (a) third-party injury/property damage, (b) professional negligence allegations, or (c) purely contractual/financial loss.
Here’s how the most relevant policies typically fit in:
Product Liability (When Damage or Injury Occurs)
If a QA failure allows a defective part to ship and it later causes property damage or injury, product liability is often the primary policy. For example, a critical tolerance error causes a mechanical failure that damages other equipment.
- Best for: injury/property damage caused by defective products
- Common limitations: pure financial loss; cost of remaking your own parts; contractual penalties
- Key factors: end-use, safety-critical exposure, territories/jurisdiction
Professional Indemnity (When Inspection Is a Service)
In some businesses, inspection and certification can be treated as a professional service — especially if you provide inspection reports, sign-off, or measurement services separate from manufacturing. Where a claim is framed as negligence in inspection, PI may be relevant.
- Best for: negligent inspection/measurement services, incorrect reports, professional sign-off errors
- Key factors: scope of services, contracts, retroactive date and wording
- Common gap: if your policy is placed as “manufacture only” but you also provide inspection services
Recall / Rectification Extensions (Where Available)
If a quality escape requires you to retrieve product, notify customers, sort inventory, or fund corrective actions, specialist recall/rectification cover may help — but it’s not standard on most policies and often needs careful underwriting.
- Can help with: notification, retrieval, disposal, and some corrective logistics (policy-dependent)
- Often requires: strong traceability, containment processes and QA systems
- Not typically for: simple “warranty” replacement without policy trigger
Business Interruption (Your Own Downtime)
QA failure events can also create disruption inside your own business: remanufacture, overtime and diverted capacity. Business interruption usually requires an insured trigger (e.g., fire), but increased cost of working and production planning is still relevant to the overall risk strategy.
- Best for: loss of profit following insured damage at your premises (policy-dependent)
- Consider: machinery breakdown + BI pairing for precision engineering operations
Important reality: many QA losses are “uninsured” unless structured properly
The most common QA failure costs — sorting, rework, chargebacks and customer downtime claims — are often classed as contractual or pure financial losses. These may be excluded from standard liability policies unless the loss results from covered injury/property damage or is covered via specialist wording. That’s why it’s important to understand your contracts and to arrange cover with realistic expectations.
How Insurers Assess QA & Inspection Risk (What They Look For)
Insurers look for evidence that you can detect problems early, isolate affected batches, and prove conformity. Strong quality systems can improve pricing and broaden insurer appetite.
- Calibration programme – frequency, traceability and out-of-tolerance actions
- Inspection planning – sampling strategy, control plans and escalation triggers
- Traceability – lot/batch tracking, retained records, material cert storage
- Non-conformance control – segregation, MRB processes and corrective actions
- Version control – drawings/CAD, ECO approvals, revision control on the shop floor
- Training – competence of inspectors/operators and sign-off processes
- Subcontract control – approved suppliers for special processes and verification steps
- Claims history – frequency/severity and improvements made
Practical steps that reduce QA loss frequency
- Automate critical measurements (where practical) and reduce manual recording errors
- Use “first-off” and “last-off” inspections for drift-sensitive runs
- Implement gage R&R on critical characteristics
- Introduce layered process audits and targeted checks for high-risk features
- Control access to CMM programs and maintain validated inspection templates
- Strengthen quarantine and non-conforming product controls
These steps also help when insurers ask: “how would you contain a quality escape within 24–48 hours?”
How to Get a Quote for QA/Inspection Risk
Most QA-related exposures sit inside product liability and/or professional indemnity, with specialist extensions for recall/rectification where possible. We’ll help you position your quality systems properly so insurers understand the control environment.
- 1. Describe products, end-use and customer industries (medical/aero/auto/general engineering)
- 2. Confirm whether you provide inspection services/reports separate from manufacturing
- 3. Provide turnover, max contract value and territories
- 4. Summarise QA controls: calibration, traceability, containment and non-conformance processes
- 5. We approach suitable insurers and compare policy wording options
Fast-track tip
If you have: ISO certifications, calibration schedules, a control plan overview, or a customer audit summary, share it. It can improve insurer confidence and reduce underwriting questions.
If you operate in medical or aerospace supply chains, insurer appetite can be sensitive. Clear disclosure and evidence of strong controls helps prevent “decline by default” outcomes.
We had a calibration issue that led to a batch being shipped out of tolerance. Insure24 helped us review our liability cover, clarify the gaps around pure financial loss, and position our QA controls properly to insurers.
Quality Manager, UK Precision Engineering FirmFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
+-
Does product liability cover a “quality escape”?
Product liability is typically focused on third-party injury or property damage caused by a defective product. If a quality escape causes damage or injury, it may respond. But if the losses are purely financial (sorting, downtime, chargebacks), those costs may be excluded unless specifically covered.
+-
Can professional indemnity cover inspection or measurement errors?
It can, where inspection is treated as a professional service and the allegation is professional negligence (e.g., an incorrect inspection report or sign-off). The policy must be arranged with the correct scope of services and wording.
+-
Are customer chargebacks and penalties insured?
Purely contractual penalties and chargebacks are often excluded unless they arise from insured liability or are specifically covered by specialist extensions. Reviewing contract clauses alongside insurance is important.
+-
Can I insure recall or rectification costs for non-conforming batches?
Sometimes. Specialist recall/rectification cover may be available depending on your products, volumes, distribution, and QA/traceability controls. It is not always included as standard and usually requires specialist underwriting.
+-
What do insurers want to see for QA risk?
Insurers typically want evidence of calibration controls, inspection planning, traceability, non-conformance handling, version control for drawings, training/competence, subcontractor control and a clear history of corrective actions after any incidents.
+-
How quickly can Insure24 arrange cover?
Many precision engineering risks can be quoted quickly once the key information is clear. If specialist elements are needed (such as recall/rectification or higher territories), underwriting may take longer — but we aim to progress matters promptly.
Important: This page provides general information only and does not constitute advice. Cover is subject to insurer underwriting, policy terms, conditions and exclusions.