My Account
We compare quotes from leading insurers
ENVIRONMENTAL COVER BUILT FOR INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT RISKS
Why Pollution Liability Matters for Machinery Builders
Environmental loss is rarely “just” a spillage. A small leak of oil, coolant, fuel, solvent or process chemical can become a costly incident once it enters drainage, soil or waterways — especially when contractors, customers or landlords become involved. Standard public liability policies often restrict pollution cover, and many exclude clean-up obligations entirely unless the wording is specifically extended.
Industrial equipment manufacturers frequently have multiple triggers: bunded storage and waste handling at the workshop, loading/unloading, deliveries, site work, hydraulic systems, commissioning activities, and the actions of subcontractors. A well-structured environmental policy (often called Environmental Impairment Liability / EIL) can fill those gaps, subject to terms and the risk information provided.
Environmental & Pollution Liability Insurance for Industrial Equipment Manufacturing (UK)
This page explains how environmental and pollution liability insurance works for industrial equipment manufacturers, OEMs and machinery builders — including the most common pollution triggers, the typical cover components, and the information insurers usually require to quote sensibly.
Insure24 supports UK manufacturing and engineering businesses with practical submission support. We help you present storage controls, spill response arrangements, site work governance and contractor oversight clearly — so insurers can offer broader terms and avoid unnecessary exclusions or restrictive sub-limits.
- Cover options for pollution incidents and third-party claims
- Clean-up / remediation cost protection (where insured)
- Premises, storage, loading/unloading and drainage exposures
- Site work disclosures: installation, commissioning, service and maintenance
- Contractor oversight and pollution responsibilities
- Practical controls insurers want to see (bunding, interceptors, spill kits)
What Does Environmental & Pollution Liability Insurance Cover?
Environmental liability policies are designed to respond to pollution and contamination events that can sit outside (or be restricted within) standard public liability wordings. Depending on the insurer and wording, cover can include third-party bodily injury and property damage, clean-up/remediation costs, and legal defence — with options to extend to certain gradual exposures, transportation, and contractor/site work activities where declared.
Typical cover components (wording dependent)
Environmental cover is not “one size fits all”. Some policies are focused on sudden and accidental incidents; others can extend to gradual pollution, historical conditions, or specific site-based triggers. The key is to match cover to your actual operations and responsibilities.
- Third-party injury and property damage arising from pollution (where insured)
- Clean-up / remediation costs (on-site and sometimes off-site)
- Emergency response and specialist contractor costs
- Legal defence costs (subject to wording)
- Premises pollution exposures (storage, bunds, drainage, interceptors)
- Extensions for site work/contractors/transport where declared
Common Pollution Triggers for Industrial Equipment Manufacturers
Pollution risk in manufacturing and engineering is often practical and routine: oils, fuels, coolants, solvents and waste streams handled every day. Even where quantities are modest, the loss can escalate if the release is unnoticed, migrates off-site, enters drains, or triggers regulatory involvement.
Examples insurers will expect you to describe clearly
Your storage and handling arrangements (including bunding and segregation), spill response plan, and site layout can materially influence insurer confidence — often more than the headline “product” you manufacture.
- Oil / hydraulic fluid leaks from plant, test rigs, forklifts or delivered machinery
- Fuel spills during refuelling, loading/unloading or generator use
- Coolant / solvent releases in machining, cleaning or finishing processes
- Waste handling issues: drums/IBCs, skips, bund failures, mislabelling
- Firewater run-off after an incident affecting drains/land/water
- Site work spills during installation/commissioning/service visits
Environmental Liability vs Public Liability: Avoiding Policy Gaps
Many claims disputes happen in the “grey area” between public liability and environmental liability. Public liability is usually structured for third-party injury/property damage arising from operations — but pollution is frequently restricted, excluded, or sub-limited. Environmental liability is designed to address pollution triggers and clean-up obligations, but it must be aligned to your declared activities.
Practical way to think about it
If the incident involves contamination and clean-up costs (especially on-site), you should assume environmental wording will be important. If it’s a straightforward third-party injury or property damage event without pollution triggers, public liability is more likely to respond. In reality, many incidents involve both — and that’s where programme design matters.
- Public liability: third-party injury/property damage from operations (pollution often restricted)
- Environmental liability (EIL): pollution incidents + clean-up obligations (wording dependent)
- Products liability: injury/property damage caused by product once in use (not clean-up focused)
- Contract works: damage to the works during installation/testing (separate from pollution)
- Transport exposures: loading/unloading and carriage can require declaration/extension
What Drives Premium and Insurer Appetite?
Environmental pricing is driven by what you store/use, how it’s contained, and how likely it is that a release could migrate off-site or enter drainage. For machinery builders, insurer appetite often swings on workshop layout, bunding and interceptor arrangements, incident history, and how your teams manage site work (including subcontractors).
The biggest swing factors we see in the market
Insurers generally want clarity and evidence: what substances are present, quantities, storage method, separation, drainage routes, spill response plan, and whether there are any known prior contamination issues. Good controls can materially broaden terms and reduce restrictive conditions.
- Materials used/stored (oils, fuels, solvents, coolants, chemicals) and quantities
- Storage controls: bunding, IBC/drum management, segregation and inspections
- Drainage/interceptors and proximity to watercourses or sensitive receptors
- Waste handling and contractor arrangements (collection, manifests, storage times)
- Site work/installation exposures and how spills are prevented/managed
- Claims/incident history and evidence of corrective actions
Controls Insurers Like to See (and Why)
The strongest environmental submissions are practical: site photos, a simple drainage plan, documented inspections, bund capacity, and clear spill response arrangements. For businesses that also install and commission equipment, insurers want to see how environmental risk is managed away from your own premises too.
Risk management that improves underwriting outcomes
If you can show basic control maturity — routine checks, containment, training and a tested response plan — insurers are more willing to offer broader terms and fewer pollution exclusions.
- Bunded storage and routine inspection logs for tanks, drums and IBCs
- Spill kits available, staff trained, and a documented spill response plan
- Drainage maps/interceptors and procedures for isolating drains in an incident
- Waste segregation, secure storage, and reputable licensed contractors
- Site work controls: containment for oils/fluids, refuelling procedures, supervision
- Incident/near-miss reporting with corrective actions and learning
What We’ll Ask For to Quote Environmental & Pollution Liability
Environmental underwriters are detail-driven, but the goal is simple: demonstrate what substances exist, how they are contained, and how you respond if something goes wrong. If you can provide the information below (even as a short summary), we can approach suitable markets quickly and reduce underwriting uncertainty.
- Premises addresses, activities and a basic site/drainage overview
- List of fuels/oils/solvents/coolants/chemicals used and maximum quantities
- Storage method: tanks/IBCs/drums, bunding capacity, inspection frequency
- Waste streams: how stored, how long, and who removes (licensed contractors)
- Spill response: kits, training, procedures and any response contractors
- Site work exposures: installation/commissioning/service and environmental controls
- Claims/incident history and what changed afterwards
- Any known historical contamination issues or prior surveys (if applicable)
“We assumed our public liability would deal with small spills, but insurers asked detailed questions about bunding and drainage. Insure24 helped us present our controls and arrange environmental cover that included clean-up costs — the peace of mind was worth it.”
Facilities Manager, Engineering & Machinery ManufacturerPROTECT YOUR BUSINESS
- Access to specialist markets for environmental and engineering risks
- Help aligning public liability and environmental cover to reduce gaps
- Support presenting storage controls, drainage and spill response to insurers
- Advice on site work disclosures: installation, commissioning and service teams
- Claims support and practical incident guidance
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
+-
Is pollution covered under standard public liability?
Sometimes you may have limited cover for sudden and accidental pollution, but many public liability policies restrict or exclude
pollution and often don’t address clean-up obligations. Environmental / pollution liability (often EIL) is designed to fill those gaps,
subject to the wording, disclosures and terms.
+-
What types of incidents are common for machinery builders?
Common triggers include oil/hydraulic leaks, coolant or solvent spills, fuel releases during refuelling, waste container failures,
contaminated run-off, and site work incidents during installation/commissioning. The severity often depends on drainage routes and whether
contamination migrates off-site.
+-
Does the policy cover clean-up and remediation costs?
Environmental policies can include clean-up/remediation costs (on-site and sometimes off-site), but it depends on the wording and triggers.
Insurers usually assess bunding, drainage, interceptors, spill response and contractor arrangements as part of underwriting.
+-
Can environmental cover extend to installation and site work?
Often yes, but it must be disclosed and structured correctly. Insurers want details of installation/commissioning/service activities,
substances used on site, spill controls, waste handling, supervision and how subcontractors are managed.
+-
What information helps Insure24 get better terms?
A clear list of materials/quantities, storage method and bunding, basic drainage/interceptor information, waste controls, spill response
plan, and evidence of routine inspections. Site photos and a short narrative of how you prevent and respond to spills can materially improve insurer confidence.
+-
How does environmental liability differ from products liability?
Products liability is usually focused on third-party injury/property damage caused by a product once it’s in use. Environmental liability
focuses on pollution/contamination events and clean-up obligations, which can sit outside standard liability policies unless specifically covered.