My Account
We compare quotes from leading insurers
PROTECT AGAINST RECALL COSTS & FIELD FAILURES
Why Product Recall & Field Failure Risk is Different to Product Liability
Electrical component manufacturers can face major costs long before any third-party injury or property damage claim appears. In practice, the most common financial impact of a defect is operational: tracing affected batches, communicating with customers, deploying engineers, replacing units, arranging returns, and containing reputational damage. These costs can arise even when there is no “liability claim” in the legal sense.
Product liability insurance is designed primarily for claims involving third-party injury or third-party property damage caused by a defective product. By contrast, product recall / field failure / rectification cover is intended to respond to the practical costs of dealing with defects and failure patterns in the field — particularly where your products are installed widely or form part of critical systems.
For manufacturers of sensors, switchgear, control panels, connectors, power supplies, chargers, cable assemblies, PCBs, instrumentation devices, and electronic enclosures, a small design or component issue can create a large-scale “field event”. Insure24 arranges specialist cover to help protect your balance sheet when these situations arise.
What is Product Recall / Rectification Insurance?
Product recall (sometimes called product rectification or field failure cover) is specialist insurance designed to cover the costs of locating, removing, repairing, replacing or correcting products that are defective or suspected of being defective — typically once the product has left your control. Cover varies by insurer and wording, but commonly focuses on the “action costs” required to prevent escalation and protect customers.
- Recall costs – customer notifications, communications, call centres (where applicable), and logistics coordination.
- Tracing & identification – serial/batch investigation, data analysis and determining affected units.
- Transport & shipping – collection/return of products and re-delivery of replacements.
- Repair or replacement – labour and parts costs to rectify defects (subject to policy scope).
- On-site engineer visits – field service costs where products must be corrected on customer sites.
- Disposal – safe disposal of defective products and related waste streams.
- Testing & re-certification – verification after rework, re-labeling and compliance checks.
- Extra expense – reasonable additional costs to keep customers supplied and limit business disruption.
Some policies are structured around a “defect discovered” trigger, while others require a “reasonable probability” of injury or damage. Your product type, end-use sector and contract wording can influence what is available. Insure24 helps you select a structure that suits electrical manufacturing realities, where failures often involve reliability, drift, overheating, arcing, insulation degradation, connector fatigue, water ingress, or firmware behaviour.
Field Failure Risk in Electrical Components
Electrical products often fail in ways that are expensive to resolve because the product is embedded in larger systems. A simple component issue can cause downtime, safety concerns, or forced maintenance windows for customers — and that can quickly turn into a large remediation programme.
The costs are not always about “compensation”; they are about executing a controlled response. Manufacturers that have strong traceability and a repeatable field action process respond faster and minimise damage. Insurance can help support the cost of that response.
Typical Failure Modes
- Overheating, arcing, insulation breakdown or terminal looseness in panels/switchgear
- Sensor drift, calibration instability or intermittent outputs in instrumentation
- Connector fatigue, poor crimps, solder joint cracking or vibration-related failures
- Ingress protection failures leading to corrosion or short circuits
- Firmware defects, configuration errors or unexpected behaviour under edge conditions
- Component substitution / counterfeit parts issues in the supply chain
- EMC susceptibility causing disruption or false readings
- Battery defects, thermal events or charger incompatibility
Why Costs Escalate
- Products are installed across multiple sites, requiring coordination and scheduling
- Access restrictions at customer locations (permits, outages, safety rules)
- Labour and travel for engineers, often at short notice
- Complex traceability across distributors, OEMs and integrators
- Urgent production of replacement units to keep customers supplied
- Reputation and contract risk if response is slow or inconsistent
- Potential regulatory/standards implications depending on sector
- Secondary losses for customers (downtime) triggering disputes
Common Recall & Field Action Scenarios (Electrical Manufacturing)
Product issues rarely appear as a single event. More often they emerge as a pattern — a rising failure rate, a customer audit finding, or a safety concern. The best response is structured and evidence-based. The scenarios below are typical in electrical components and electronics.
Batch Component Issue Across Installed Base
A supplier provides a batch of capacitors or relays with a latent defect. The issue only appears after months in service. Customers report intermittent faults. You need to trace affected serial numbers, notify customers, arrange returns, and replace units to prevent failures escalating.
- Tracing and affected-unit identification
- Customer communications and coordination
- Replacement manufacture and shipping
- Return logistics and disposal of defective parts
Control Panel Overheating Concern
A design change increases internal temperatures in certain operating conditions. A customer audit identifies that the margin is lower than expected and asks for corrective action. You deploy engineers to inspect and retrofit cooling/spacing changes across multiple sites.
- Site inspections and engineering time
- Retrofit kits, parts and labour
- Coordinating shutdown windows and permits
- Documentation and re-certification where required
Sensor Drift / Calibration Field Campaign
A certain sensor model shows drift outside tolerance in specific temperature ranges. Customers rely on readings to control process parameters. You must organise calibration checks, replacements, and data review to ensure process quality is protected.
- Testing and calibration costs
- Field engineer visits and scheduling
- Replacement units and controlled returns
- Evidence capture and root cause analysis
Firmware Update / Configuration Rectification
A firmware defect causes incorrect outputs under rare conditions. You must coordinate a controlled update across the installed base to prevent unexpected behaviour. Depending on sector, documentation and change control may be required.
- Release planning and communication
- Remote update tooling / on-site assistance
- Verification testing and sign-off evidence
- Potential customer disputes if downtime occurs
These scenarios highlight the “action cost” nature of recall/rectification. Insurance can be structured to support these costs and reduce the financial shock of an unexpected field campaign — while you focus on solving the technical problem.
What Insurers Look For (and How to Improve Terms)
Recall and field failure cover is underwritten on process discipline. Underwriters want confidence that defects will be detected early, affected units can be identified, and corrective action can be delivered in a controlled way. Your quality systems often matter as much as the product itself.
Traceability & Quality Controls
- Serial number and batch traceability (inputs and outputs)
- Incoming inspection and supplier approval processes
- Routine testing and final inspection records
- Change control for design, firmware and components
- Nonconformance and CAPA processes
- Retention of test data and build history
Field Action Preparedness
- Documented field action / recall procedure
- Customer notification and escalation plan
- Engineering capacity for rapid inspection and retrofit
- Stock availability and alternative sourcing plans
- Returns handling, quarantine and disposal processes
- Clear decision-making authority and incident logging
Insure24 can help you create an “underwriter-ready” summary of your recall controls — often a key differentiator when insurers assess electrical manufacturing risks. Good documentation can reduce friction at both quotation and renewal.
We had an unexpected field failure pattern caused by a supplier component. The biggest costs were logistics, engineering time and replacement programmes — not a liability claim. Insure24 helped us structure recall/rectification cover that actually matched how our business operates.
Quality Manager, UK Electrical Components ManufacturerHow to Arrange Product Recall & Field Failure Risk Insurance
Recall and rectification cover is usually tailored and may require underwriter review. If you supply OEMs, export widely, or operate in regulated sectors, insurers may request additional documentation. As a guide, allow 1–2 business days for underwriter assessment once the core information is provided.
- 1. Confirm products and sectors served (and whether any are safety-critical)
- 2. Provide turnover split, territories, distributors/OEM relationships
- 3. Share an overview of QC, traceability, testing and change control
- 4. Review cover triggers, limits, deductibles and extensions
- 5. Bind cover and keep a clear recall response plan in place
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
+-
Is product recall insurance the same as product liability insurance?
No. Product liability is primarily designed for third-party injury or third-party property damage claims caused by defective products.
Product recall/rectification is intended to help cover the practical costs of tracing, removing, repairing or replacing defective products,
depending on policy wording.
+-
What costs can product recall cover include?
Depending on the policy, costs can include investigation and tracing, customer notifications, shipping/returns logistics, repair or replacement labour and parts,
disposal, testing and verification, and certain additional expenses required to manage a field action.
+-
Do I need recall cover if I manufacture B2B products only?
Many B2B manufacturers still face significant recall/rectification costs because products are installed across customer sites and integrated into larger systems.
Even without consumer recall obligations, OEM customers may require structured field action and reimbursement if defects are found.
+-
Will insurers cover gradual failure patterns or reliability issues?
It depends on the wording and trigger. Some policies respond to discovered defects and recall actions, while others require a reasonable probability of injury or damage.
Insure24 will help you select a policy structure aligned with your products and end-use sectors.
+-
What do insurers look for to offer good terms?
Strong traceability, robust QC/testing, supplier management, change control, CAPA procedures and a documented recall/field action process.
Underwriters want confidence that you can identify affected units quickly and manage a controlled response.
+-
How quickly can I get a quote?
Many risks require underwriter review. If you supply OEMs, export widely, or operate in regulated sectors, allow 1–2 business days for assessment once core information is provided.
We’ll keep you updated throughout.
UNIQUE INSURANCE
TAILORED FOR YOU
Product defects and field failures can trigger expensive response programmes even when there is no formal liability claim. Speak to Insure24 to arrange product recall/rectification cover that reflects your products, traceability systems and customer contract environment.
PROTECT YOURSELF
- Funding for recall and rectification programmes
- Support for tracing, investigation and customer communication
- Cover options for field service and replacement logistics
- Insurance aligned with QC, traceability and change control
- Help presenting the risk to underwriters to secure terms