My Account
We compare quotes from leading insurers
ESD DAMAGE RISK IS REAL — PROTECT YOUR COMPONENTS, YOUR MARGINS AND YOUR OEM RELATIONSHIPS
What is ESD & Component Damage Risk?
Electrostatic discharge (ESD) is one of the most costly and misunderstood risks in electronics manufacturing. A discharge you can’t feel may still damage sensitive components—especially MOSFETs, IGBTs, ICs, sensors, microcontrollers and memory devices. Sometimes the damage is immediate and obvious. More often it becomes a latent defect that passes factory testing but fails later in service.
For electrical components manufacturers, the financial impact can be significant: rework and scrap, warranty replacements, expedited rebuilds, OEM line disruption, and reputational damage. ESD incidents also frequently trigger disputes about responsibility—particularly in contract manufacturing, OEM supply chains and multi-stage assembly routes.
This page explains the insurance options and how Insure24 helps you present your risk to insurers properly. Not every loss is insurable and cover varies by policy and wording, but we can help you build a programme that supports your contracts and reduces commercial shock when defects arise.
Where ESD & Component Damage Typically Occurs
ESD risk exists across the entire lifecycle of an electronic component: goods-in inspection, stores, kitting, pick-and-place, hand assembly, test benches, rework, packing and dispatch. It can also occur off-site during installation and commissioning—particularly if field engineers handle exposed boards in uncontrolled environments.
In practice, ESD losses often arise from small control gaps: a broken wrist strap, missing heel grounders, damaged ESD mat, incorrect humidity control, non-compliant packaging, or rushed rework procedures during peak demand.
High-Risk Touch Points
- Goods-in handling and decanting of reels/trays into storage
- Component kitting and line feeding, especially mixed manual/automated processes
- Hand soldering and rework stations (hot air, iron, BGA rework)
- Functional testing, probing and in-circuit testing
- Board-level repair and warranty refurbishment
- Packing, dispatch and returns processing
- Field engineer handling and on-site fault diagnosis
Other Component Damage Risks (Not Just ESD)
- Moisture sensitivity (MSL) breaches and improper bake/storage controls
- Contamination: flux residues, particulates, oils and handling marks
- Mechanical stress: cracked MLCCs, bent leads, damaged connectors
- Incorrect storage conditions: humidity/temperature drift
- Incorrect packaging: non-ESD bags, damaged shielding, inadequate cushioning
- Transit damage (inbound components or outbound assemblies)
Insurance Options for ESD & Component Damage
ESD and component damage losses often sit in the grey area between quality risk and insurable events. Traditional policies are built around “fortuitous” incidents (fire, theft, flood, injury/property damage). ESD damage is sometimes gradual, hard to detect, and may be classed as faulty workmanship or product defect—areas that many policies restrict or exclude.
That doesn’t mean you’re exposed with no options. The key is selecting the right mix of covers—property/stock, goods in transit, product liability, product recall/remediation and (where relevant) professional indemnity—then structuring the presentation so underwriters understand: your processes, controls, traceability, and the realistic loss scenarios.
Policies That May Be Relevant (Subject to Wording)
- Property / Stock – damage or loss to your components and WIP from insured perils (e.g., fire, theft, flood)
- Goods in Transit – loss or damage during shipping (inbound/outbound), including packaging-related damage where covered
- Products Liability – if defective assemblies cause bodily injury or property damage
- Product Recall / Remediation – costs to withdraw, replace, rework or repair affected batches (availability varies)
- Professional Indemnity – if you provide design/specification advice linked to failure allegations
- Cyber – if traceability/test records are compromised or disruption triggers quality disputes
Insure24 will explain which parts of your exposure are likely insurable and where contract/risk control is the better solution.
Common Pain Points (Where Businesses Get Caught Out)
- Assuming “product liability” pays for rework or replacement costs (often it doesn’t unless there’s injury/property damage)
- No clarity on who owns stock in WIP (customer-owned materials, consignment stock, tooling, etc.)
- Inadequate traceability makes loss containment impossible
- Contracts that impose unlimited quality penalties or line stoppage liability
- Inconsistent ESD compliance across shifts, areas or contractors
- No documented CAPA process to evidence learning and improvement
The goal is to avoid surprises by aligning policy scope and contracts to the practical realities of ESD and component damage risk.
ESD Losses in OEM & Contract Supply Chains
ESD damage is notorious in OEM environments because multiple parties may touch a component before it reaches the final product: distributor → manufacturer goods-in → stores → kitting → assembly → test → OEM integration → end user. If a failure occurs months later, it can be difficult to prove when the damage occurred and who is responsible.
That is why OEM customers place such emphasis on evidence: ESD audit trails, staff training, wrist strap testing, humidity logs, packaging standards and traceability. Underwriters take the same view—clear controls reduce the chance of disputes and make losses easier to contain.
Common OEM Claim Allegations
- Latent defect causes field failure and the OEM alleges “poor handling” or “ESD breach”
- Batch failures traced to a process drift or rework station control gap
- Incorrect MSL storage leads to solder joint cracking and later failure
- Non-compliant packaging causes damage in transit or on the customer’s line
- Incomplete traceability makes recall/rework scope broader than necessary
Controls That Help You Defend & Contain
- Documented ESD programme (zones, equipment, training, audits)
- Wrist strap/footwear testing with logged results
- Humidity monitoring and limits in sensitive areas
- ESD-safe packaging and controlled shipping methods
- Traceability: lot/batch, serialisation, rework tracking and retention periods
- Formal CAPA (corrective & preventive action) workflow
The stronger the evidence, the faster you can isolate the issue, reduce rework cost, and preserve OEM trust.
What Underwriters Want to Know About Your ESD Controls
When arranging insurance for electronics manufacturing, underwriters often ask targeted questions about ESD and quality control because it directly impacts defect frequency, claim probability and dispute severity. A well-prepared presentation can improve terms and reduce exclusions.
Typical ESD Underwriting Questions
- Do you operate defined ESD protected areas (EPAs) and how are they controlled?
- Do you test wrist straps/footwear and keep logs?
- What ESD training is provided and how frequently is it refreshed?
- How do you handle incoming components and packaging compliance?
- How are humidity and environmental conditions monitored?
- How do you manage rework and repairs (controls, authorisation, documentation)?
- What traceability and record retention do you have?
Helpful Documents (If You Have Them)
- ESD policy and EPA layout (zones, signage, equipment)
- Training records and competency sign-off
- Audit results and corrective actions
- Humidity logs and environmental monitoring evidence
- Packaging standards and supplier requirements
- Traceability process description (serialisation, lot control)
- CAPA procedure and example anonymised reports
Don’t worry if you don’t have everything formalised—we can still quote. The goal is clarity and honesty so the right cover is placed.
Illustrative Scenarios: ESD & Component Damage Claims
These examples are illustrative and not a guarantee of cover. Whether a policy responds depends on the insured event, the cause of loss, policy wording, exclusions and the facts of the claim.
Scenario: Latent ESD Damage Leads to Warranty Returns
Situation: A batch of assemblies passes factory test, but months later customers report intermittent faults. Investigation points to latent ESD damage on a sensitive IC.
Impact: Warranty returns, rework, customer trust issues, and potential OEM dispute about root cause and responsibility.
Insurance angle: Rework/warranty costs are often not covered by standard product liability unless injury/property damage occurs. Recall/remediation solutions may be relevant where available and triggered.
Scenario: Transit Packaging Failure Damages High-Value Boards
Situation: Outbound assemblies are shipped with inadequate shielding and cushioning. A portion arrives damaged.
Impact: Replacement builds, expediting, potential delivery penalties and customer dissatisfaction.
Insurance angle: Goods in transit cover may respond to physical damage in transit depending on packaging warranties and policy terms.
Scenario: Component Contamination Causes Field Failures
Situation: Contamination (flux residue/particulate) results in leakage paths and later failures in humid environments.
Impact: Recall discussions, OEM investigations, and possible claims if property damage occurs downstream.
Insurance angle: If third-party property damage occurs, product liability may respond (subject to policy terms). Recall/remediation may be considered for batch issues.
Scenario: Customer-Owned Consignment Stock is Damaged
Situation: Customer-owned consignment components are stored on site. A handling incident damages multiple reels/trays.
Impact: Replacement costs and contract disputes about responsibility.
Insurance angle: “Goods held in trust/custody” style cover may be relevant where arranged and subject to the policy wording.
“ESD incidents are hard because the failure shows up later. Insure24 helped us structure cover and present our ESD controls clearly to insurers and OEM customers.”
Quality Manager, UK Electronics ManufacturerWhy Choose Insure24
ESD and component damage risk sits at the intersection of quality control, contracts and insurance wording. We help you avoid the classic mistakes: assuming product liability covers rework, ignoring customer-owned stock exposures, and failing to evidence ESD controls. Our approach is practical and manufacturing-aware, built to support real-world OEM supply chains.
- Specialist manufacturing broking with electronics risk understanding
- Guidance on policy structure for defect/recall-style exposures
- Help aligning insurance evidence with OEM onboarding requirements
- Clear underwriting presentations that reflect your controls
- Claims support approach when disputes arise
How to Arrange ESD & Component Damage-Related Insurance
There isn’t usually a single policy labelled “ESD insurance”. Instead, we help you build a programme that addresses the realistic loss scenarios: damage to your own stock, damage in transit, customer property in your care, downstream liability, and recall/remediation options where appropriate.
The fastest route to terms is a clear summary of your operation, products, customers, and controls. If you already have an ESD programme, we can reflect it in the underwriting presentation.
- 1. Tell us what you handle – component types, value concentrations, WIP and finished assemblies
- 2. Explain your processes – stores, kitting, assembly, rework, test and dispatch
- 3. Identify exposures – customer-owned stock, exports, high-value shipments, contract penalties
- 4. Share controls – ESD programme, audits, traceability, packaging standards
- 5. We approach insurers – align cover, limits and wording to your risks
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
+-
Is there a specific “ESD insurance policy”?
Not usually. ESD losses are typically addressed through a combination of covers (property/stock, goods in transit, product liability, recall/remediation, PI where relevant),
alongside strong ESD controls and clear contracts. We help you structure the right programme for your exposures.
+-
Does product liability cover the cost of replacing faulty components or rework?
Often not. Product liability typically responds to bodily injury or property damage caused by your product, subject to policy terms.
Pure rework, replacement or warranty costs can fall outside standard product liability, which is why recall/remediation solutions may be relevant.
+-
Can insurance cover customer-owned components stored at our premises?
Sometimes. Where you hold customer-owned stock on site, “goods in trust/custody” style arrangements may be possible, subject to insurer acceptance and policy wording.
We’ll advise what details are needed (values, storage conditions, contracts, traceability).
+-
What ESD controls do insurers look for?
Common expectations include defined ESD protected areas (EPAs), wrist strap/footwear testing, training and audits, humidity monitoring,
ESD-safe packaging, controlled rework procedures, and robust traceability with record retention.
+-
How quickly can Insure24 obtain terms?
If you can provide core details (turnover, processes, stock values, customer-owned stock exposure, and your ESD controls), we can usually obtain indicative terms quickly.
More complex risks or recall-style discussions may take 1–2 business days for specialist underwriting.